A Text Message at 3 A.M.

On October 28, 2025, Amazon employees across the United States woke up to text messages and emails — some of them arriving before dawn, at 3 or 4 in the morning depending on their time zone. The message was short: your employment had been terminated.

There was no manager’s meeting. No gradual wind-down. By 8 a.m., those employees had lost access to their work laptops and company systems. Some couldn’t even retrieve their personal files or saved work documents. The total headcount affected in that first announcement: 14,000 positions eliminated in a single day, with reports suggesting the final number could exceed 30,000 over the following months.

What stung most for many of those affected wasn’t the fact of the layoff — it was the context. Some had received outstanding performance reviews just weeks earlier. Others had recently been promoted.

That same year, Microsoft laid off approximately 15,000 employees across two rounds — 6,000 in May and another 9,000 in July. A former Microsoft engineer named Daniel Sada Caraveo published a widely-read essay describing what he called “the broken pact”: Microsoft employees had historically accepted salaries 20 to 50% below market rates in exchange for a single implied guarantee — stability. Everyone knew the unwritten deal. And then it was broken without warning.

“They paid us well; they gave us good severance. But the experience made me feel like I was just a tool. If they need you, they hire you. If they don’t need you, they discard you.”

Those words weren’t written by a freelancer complaining about volatile income. They were reported by Fortune from a senior employee at one of the most respected tech companies in the world, following the 2023 layoff wave that preceded the even larger cuts of 2025.

We open with these stories not to condemn corporations, but to ask a foundational question: if job security is an illusion at the world’s most powerful companies, what does that mean for anyone still clinging to the belief that a stable job is safer than freelancing?

The Myth We Were Raised On

The myth of permanent employment has real historical roots, and we should be fair about that. In the post-war decades of the mid-twentieth century, particularly in Western economies, large employers did maintain something close to a genuine social contract with their workers. Stable long-term employment, guaranteed pensions, decades-long loyalty rewarded with lifetime security. The economy moved more slowly. Globalization was limited. Automation was a distant abstraction.

That world is gone. But the mental model many people carry — particularly those raised in cultures where finding a “government job” or a “permanent position” was the definition of professional success — hasn’t updated to match the reality we actually live in.

That gap between the inherited image and the lived reality is one of the most financially dangerous assumptions a working person can carry.

The Numbers Don’t Lie

Any honest comparison between employment and freelancing requires looking at the real data, not the comforting assumptions:

In 2025 alone, at least 245,953 employees at US-based tech companies lost their jobs — an average of 674 people per day, every day of the year. (Crunchbase / Layoffs.fyi)
In just the first months of 2026, that figure had already surpassed 55,000 in the tech sector alone.
In 2025, companies cited artificial intelligence as a justification for more than 54,000 layoffs — and that’s only what was explicitly stated. (Challenger, Gray & Christmas)
The median duration of unemployment after a layoff climbed from 9.8 weeks to 10.4 weeks in 2025, meaning that displaced workers are taking longer to find new roles — because many of those roles no longer exist.

Does this mean freelancing is always better? No. But it means, unambiguously, that the equation “employment = security” no longer holds in the way it once did.

Two Real Stories — The Hidden Faces of Each Choice

To understand this equation from the inside, we want to bring you two real people whose experiences illuminate what the data alone cannot.

Story One: Laura Briggs — When Layoffs Become a Turning Point

Laura Briggs is an American writer and business consultant who told her story in Entrepreneur magazine in September 2025. Early in her career, she experienced an abrupt layoff — the very thing most employees dread above all else. The collapse was emotional before it was financial. As she described it, losing a job rarely feels like just losing a paycheck. It feels like losing an identity, a routine, and a foundation.

But that layoff pushed her into freelancing. Thirteen years passed — and freelancing became not just her primary income, but the foundation of a business she could never have imagined from inside a corporate office.

The most important part of her story: in 2024, while working in a well-paying remote salaried role, she was laid off a second time. This time, she had something she hadn’t possessed in the first round — an established freelance practice, a client base, a professional network. It took seven months to fully rebuild her independent business. But she did it. And she said plainly that she’d rather be the one creating her own paycheck than trusting someone else to protect it.

Story Two: The Microsoft Engineer and Twenty Years of Loyalty

In his widely-circulated essay, Daniel Sada Caraveo wrote about colleagues who had been at Microsoft for fifteen or twenty years — people who had grown up professionally alongside the institution, who had accepted below-market salaries because they believed in the unspoken deal. If you do good work, you have a place.

In 2025, while Microsoft reported record quarterly earnings of $61 billion, those employees were let go in two rounds. The reason wasn’t performance. It was strategic restructuring to fund the company’s AI ambitions. The institution they had built their professional loyalty around simply decided it no longer needed them in their current form.

The lesson isn’t that Microsoft is a bad company. The lesson is that institutions make strategic decisions, not loyalty decisions. That’s entirely rational in the logic of business — but it means that any employee who builds their financial plan on the assumption that their job will always be there is building on borrowed certainty.

Companies don’t lay off employees because those employees failed. They lay them off because their strategy changed. The difference is this: in the first case, you had control. In the second, you never did.

What Steady Employment Hides

When people compare a salaried job to freelancing, they almost always compare the visible numbers — the headline salary against the freelancer’s project rates. The actual comparison is more complex, and the actual costs of employment are rarely calculated honestly.

The Illusion of the “Sufficient” Salary

Consider what a salaried position actually costs, beyond what the employer pays:

Commuting: In cities like Dubai, Riyadh, or London, daily commuting costs — fuel, parking, public transport, and lost time — can add up to hundreds of dollars per month. The freelancer working from home pays none of this.
Appearance costs: Corporate environments carry unspoken expectations around clothing and presentation that freelancers largely avoid.
Unpaid time: Endless meetings, unofficial overtime, and the culture of “staying late to show commitment” are invisible costs that rarely appear in a salary comparison.
The satisfaction tax: Gallup’s 2024 State of the Global Workplace report found that 77% of employees worldwide are either “not engaged” or “actively disengaged” from their work. Three in four employees go to jobs they don’t feel connected to. That has real cognitive and psychological costs that don’t appear on a pay stub.

The Biggest Illusion: “It Won’t Happen to Me”

One of the most common cognitive traps around employment is the belief that layoffs happen to others — the poor performers, the unmotivated, the politically isolated. But the Amazon October 2025 layoffs included recently promoted employees with excellent performance reviews. The Microsoft cuts included engineers who had spent months learning to integrate AI tools into their workflows — only to discover those tools had replaced them.

High performers get laid off. Loyal employees get laid off. This is not a failure of the system — it is the system working exactly as designed from the company’s perspective.

Artificial Intelligence: The Wave No One Wants to Look at Honestly

Even if we set aside market crises and external shocks, a deeper and more durable force is reshaping the employment equation: AI-driven automation of cognitive tasks.

The evidence is no longer speculative:

IBM eliminated approximately 8,000 positions in HR and administrative services after AI tools took over those functions. The company simultaneously began hiring more engineers and specialized roles — signaling a structural shift, not a temporary cost-cut.
Microsoft engineers who were laid off in 2025 were told, in some cases, that they had spent months learning to integrate AI tools into their workflows — only to discover that those same tools had made their positions redundant.
Klarna replaced its customer service team with AI — and then had to bring human workers back after the system failed in practice. More than 55% of companies that cut specifically to deploy AI now report regretting the decision. But that regret doesn’t restore the jobs of those who were displaced.

This doesn’t mean AI is the enemy. It means the structural protection that steady employment once provided has been quietly eroding. The most stable jobs of the previous two decades — accounting, customer service, data entry, certain forms of proofreading and mechanical translation — are now among the most directly threatened.

How Freelancers Relate to AI Differently

There’s a meaningful paradox here. Freelancers tend to adopt AI tools not with anxiety, but with pragmatism — because using AI directly raises their output and income per hour. A Fiverr study found that freelancers using AI save an average of eight hours per week. For a freelancer, that’s either more projects or better margins on existing ones.

The employed worker, by contrast, faces a perverse incentive: mastering AI tools may accelerate the process of making their own role redundant. This is not a hypothetical — it was precisely the experience documented among Microsoft’s 2025 layoff cohort.

By 2025, 54% of freelancers reported advanced AI skills, compared to just 38% of full-time employees. That gap is widening, not narrowing.

So — Is Freelancing Always Better?

We are not arguing that you should resign tomorrow. That isn’t the point of this series. The point is to stop believing in a version of job security that no longer exists — because that belief actively undermines your preparation for whatever comes next, regardless of which path you choose.

An honest comparison looks like this:

Dimension	Salaried Employment	Freelancing
Income	Regular and predictable — but capped and vulnerable to sudden termination	Variable — but with no ceiling and multiple potential sources
Stability	Depends on corporate strategy, not your performance alone	Depends on your diversification and financial structure
AI resilience	Weaker — mid-tier roles are most directly threatened	Stronger — adaptation happens faster and with direct financial incentive
Benefits	Provided by employer (in some systems)	Your full responsibility — but buildable with planning
Career growth	Constrained by organizational hierarchy	Open — but requires continuous self-investment
Time autonomy	Fixed schedules and location	Flexible — but demands high self-discipline

The problem isn’t the choice itself — it’s the illusions that accompany it. The employee who believes their position is permanently protected builds their financial life on unstable ground. The freelancer who builds no financial structure remains perpetually vulnerable to every incoming wave.

When a Salaried Worker Gets Laid Off — What the Freelancer Has That They Don’t

A 2024 survey by A.Team found that 73% of professionals now view freelancing more favorably in the wake of recent layoffs, while 64% have lost confidence in full-time employment as a reliable long-term model.

But transitioning to freelancing after a layoff — rather than before — carries a real cost. Laura Briggs took seven months to rebuild her independent practice after her 2024 layoff, and she had prior freelance experience. Someone starting from scratch might need considerably longer.

By contrast, someone who has built a parallel freelance track while employed, or who maintains genuine financial awareness about their employment risks, is far more insulated when the disruption arrives.

About 22% of current freelancers in the US started their independent careers directly after being laid off. The smarter number is the one that begins preparing before the emergency arrives.

One more data point worth sitting with: following layoffs in 2023 and 2024, 69% of employers hired freelancers to sustain output — and 99% plan to continue doing so in 2025. The companies that eliminated full-time roles immediately turned to the freelance market to fill the gaps. For a prepared freelancer, every corporate restructuring announcement is also a market signal.

What You Can Do Today — Regardless of Your Choice

Whether you’re currently employed or freelancing, these principles reduce vulnerability across both models:

First: Build a Parallel Income Stream — Even as an Employee

The principle here is not resignation, but construction. A small freelance project, a digital product, a consulting engagement, or even teaching the skills you’ve already mastered — what matters is that the income stream exists before you need it, not after you’ve lost the salary.

Second: Calculate the True Value of Your Employment

Ask yourself honestly: if your job ended tomorrow, how many months could you sustain your current life? Three months? One month? Less? Your answer to that question is a far more accurate measure of your financial security than your monthly salary figure.

Third: Don’t Rely on Severance as Your Safety Net

In many legal systems, particularly across the Arab world, severance is legally limited and may not sustain you for more than a few months. Building your own emergency reserve — which is the subject of Article 4 of this series — remains the most reliable form of protection available to anyone in the modern labor market.

Real financial security isn’t given to you by the company that employs you. It’s built by the reserves you create before you need them.

Conclusion: Don’t Choose the Illusion — Choose Awareness

The argument here is not that employment is bad. It isn’t. A salaried position offers real advantages — predictable cash flow, professional community, daily structure, and in many systems, meaningful social protections. But it is not the absolute security it is marketed as, and treating it as such is a financial mistake with serious consequences.

The employee who understands this doesn’t fear the future — they prepare for it. They treat their salary as a primary income source, not a permanent guarantee. They build reserves. They develop skills that are marketable beyond the walls of their current employer. And they reframe their definition of security from “I’m safe because I have a job” to “I’m safe because I’m ready.”

The freelancer who understands this stops looking enviously at the employee’s monthly paycheck — and focuses instead on building the financial structure that makes their freedom sustainable, not just exciting.

In the next article, we move from diagnosis to strategy: how to diversify your income as a freelancer, and why keeping all your work in one basket is one of the most dangerous decisions you can make. (See our article: Don’t Put All Your Eggs in One Basket)

Sources:

Crunchbase News — Tech Layoffs Tracker 2025–2026 (updated weekly).
Fortune — “Tech layoffs 2025: How Microsoft, Google, and Meta are plotting for the AI era” — July 2025.
Elephas.app — “Amazon Cuts 14,000 Jobs in October 2025” — November 2025.
Daniel Sada Caraveo — “The Broken Microsoft Pact” — July 2025.
Entrepreneur — Laura Briggs, “Being Laid Off Isn’t the End” — September 2025.
Challenger, Gray & Christmas — AI Layoffs Report 2025.
Gallup — State of the Global Workplace 2024.
Fiverr / Mellow — Freelance Trends Report 2025.
A.Team — Workforce Confidence Survey 2024.
High5Test.com — Freelance Statistics 2024–2025.
HR Grapevine — “Scrutiny of tech layoffs intensifies” — March 2026.

🌐 Read this article in Arabic

The Myth of Job Security — An Honest Comparison Between Salary and Freedom

A Text Message at 3 A.M.